| Author | Thread |
|
|
05/25/2010 08:04:15 PM |
|
 Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
05/25/2010 07:22:43 PM |
| This is a brilliant example. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/09/2008 02:16:25 PM |
Ooohhhh, I love how much difference the fluffy clouds in the foreground make - they add so much to the depth and to getting the scale of it all.
I do agree with the border, though.... I think they might be easier to view if they had a border. |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
03/09/2008 01:18:30 PM |
| Oh wow, this is fantastic!! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
06/16/2006 01:01:04 AM |
| This (these?)is (are?)excellent. No problem with viewing in stereo. Fascinated by the fact one could make out about 15 depth levels, as opposed to about 6 in monovision. interesting about the distance between the photos! |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
|
|
12/30/2005 03:00:04 AM |
| I have trouble viewing this one without a separation border between and around the 2 images. In other sterograms that I've been able to view, the border aids in being able to view 3 of them, the middle one being the 3D one. Without it, it always goes back to one image for me. I went ahead and added a border in Gimp and I was able to get it to work much better with a simple white border. Beautiful stereogram once I was able to get it to work :) |
|
| Photographer found comment helpful. |
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2024 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/31/2024 08:12:40 PM EDT.
Add photograph to your favorites
Add photographer to your favorites
